Montecarlo Application on Nucleon Dynamics in Calculating Fission Yield at 14 MeV Neutron Energy
Main Article Content
Abstract
Nuclear data is a completeness that must be present in every activity related to nuclear technology. So high is the role of nuclear data, it is necessary to have very complete nuclear data. The need for nuclear data is not in line with the resulting experimental products. The amount of experimental data needs to be completed. This is because the operational costs for these experiments are costly. Thus, theoretical modeling calculations are inevitably the right choice to replace experimental results. Many theoretical models have been developed to obtain satisfactory results. They were starting from microscopic models to macroscopic models. A common obstacle is that microscopic models must be simplified and efficient to produce massive nuclear data. Meanwhile, the constraints on the macroscopic model could be more accurate. This paper will present a calculation that tries to produce accurate but uncomplicated and economical data. This technique uses the basic principles of random numbers and classical nucleon dynamics in the nucleus. At the end of the paper, the results of calculations are presented, which are very accurate and, at the same time, show the dynamics of the nucleons that occur.
Downloads
Article Details
References
(2) Z.-A. Wang and J. Pei, Optimizing multilayer Bayesian neural networks for evaluation of fission yields, Phys. Rev. C 104, 064608 (2021) .
(3) M. Bender et al., Future of nuclear fission theory, J. Phys. G 47, 113002 (2020) .
(4) L. A. Bernstein, D. A. Brown, A. J. Koning, B. T. Rearden, C. E. Romano, A. A. Sonzogni, A. S. Voyles, and W. Younes, Our Future Nuclear Data Needs, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci 69, 109 (2019) .
(5) N. Schunck and L. M. Robledo, Microscopic theory of nuclear fission: a review, Rep. Prog. Phys 79, 116301 (2016) ;
(6) K.-H. Schmidt and B. Jurado, Review on the progress in nuclear fission-experimental methods and theoretical descriptions, Rep. Prog. Phys 81, 106301 (2018) ;
(7) Y. Qiang, J. C. Pei, and P. D. Stevenson, Fission dynamics of compound nuclei: Pairing versus fluctuations, Phys. Rev. C 103, L031304 (2021) ;
(8) A. Bulgac, S. Jin, K. J. Roche, N. Schunck, and I. Stetcu, Fission dynamics of 240Pu from saddle to scission and beyond, Phys. Rev. C 100, 034615 (2019) ;
(9) M. R. Mumpower, P. Jaffke, M. Verriere, and J. Randrup, Primary fission fragment mass yields across the chart of nuclides, Phys. Rev. C 101, 054607 (2020) ;
(10) L. L. Liu, X. Z. Wu, Y. J. Chen, C. W. Shen, Z. X. Li, and Z. G. Ge, mpact of nuclear dissipation on the fission dynamics within the Langevin approach, Phys. Rev. C 105, 034614 (2022) ;
(11) J. Sadhukhan, S. A. Giuliani, Z. Matheson,and W. Nazarewicz, Efficient method for estimation of fission fragment yields of r-process nuclei, Phys. Rev. C 101, 065803 (2020)
(12) M. Rizea, N. Carjan, ANALYSIS OF THE SCISSION NEUTRONS BY A TIME-DEPENDENT APPROACH, Proceedings of the Romanian Academy, Series A 16, 176 (2015) .
(13) J. Zhao, T. Nikˇsi´c, D. Vretenar, and S-G. Zhou, Time-dependent generator coordinate method study of fission: Mass parameter, Phys. Rev. C 101, 064605 (2020) .
(14) M. Verriere and D. Regnier, The Time-Dependent Generator Coordinate Method in Nuclear Physics, Frontier in Physics 8, 233 (2020)
(15) W. Younes, D. Gogny, and J.-F. Berger, LLNL-BOOK-754886 (2018).
(16) B. D. Pierson, L. R. Greenwood, M. Flaska, S. A. Pozzi , Fission Product Yields from 232Th, 238U, and 235U Using 14 MeV Neutrons,Nuclear Data Sheets 139, 171 (2017) .
(17) M. Mac Innes, M.B. Chadwick, T. Kawano, ENDF/B-VII.1 Nuclear Data for Science and Technology: Cross Sections, Covariances, Fission Product Yields and Decay Data, Nuclear Data Sheets 112, 2887 (2011) .
(18) P. Siegler, F-J. Hambsch, S. Oberstedt, J.P. Theobald, Fission modes in the compound nucleus 238Np, Nucl. Phys. A 594, 45 (1995) .
(19) J. Katakura, JENDL FP Decay Data File 2011 and Fission Yields Data File 2011, JAEAData/Code 2011-025, Japan Atomic Energy Agency, (2011)
(20) U. Brosa, S. Grossmann, A. M¨uller, and E. Becker, Nuclear scission, Nucl. Phys. A 502, 423 (1989) .
(21) Higgins et al., Fission fragment mass yields and total kinetic energy release in neutron-induced fission of 233U from thermal energies to 40 MeV, Phys. Rev. C 101, 014601 (2020)
(22) V. Simutkin, Fragment Mass Distribution in Neutron-Induced Fission of 232Th and 238U from 10 to 60 MeV, Ph.D. thesis, Uppsala Universitet, 2010.
(23) V.D.Simutkin et al., Experimental Neutron-induced Fission Fragment Mass Yields of 232Th and 238U at Energies from 10 to 33 Me, Nuclear Data Sheets 119, 331 (2014) .
(24) T. R. England and B. F. Rider, ENDF-349: Evaluation and Compilation of Fission Product Yields (Tech. rep.), Los Alamos National Laboratory, (1994).
(25) U. Brosa, S. Grossmann, A. M¨uller, Nuclear Scission, Phys. Rep. 197, 4 (1990) .J. Lee, C. Gil, S. Hong, Calculation of fission product yields for uranium isotopes by using a semi-empirical model, Eur. Phys. J. A 54, 173, 2018.