Total Kinetic Energy of Fission Fragments based on Fission Product Data

Main Article Content

rizal kurniadi

Abstract

Total kinetic energy (TKE) is the physical quantity that must be acquired during a nuclear fission reaction. This energy is used for various purposes, primarily to determine the spectrum of the second proton. This spectrum is advantageous in the design of nuclear reactors. Various techniques for calculating TKE, from microscopic to macroscopic, have been carried out, from statistical to quantum reviews. This whole technique is solely for obtaining TKE accurately. This paper will review the TKE calculation based on the fission products' experimental results. This fission product data can be in the form of raw experimental data or evaluated data. The calculations are carried out within a macroscopic and statistical review framework. The macroscopic view is a liquid drop model, while the statistics use the random number technique. Because the liquid drop model and the random number technique are very standard, this paper does not review them.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
kurniadi, rizal. (2023). Total Kinetic Energy of Fission Fragments based on Fission Product Data. Indonesian Journal of Physics, 34(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.5614/itb.ijp.2023.34.1.1
Section
Articles

References

(1) J. Lee, C. Gil, S. Hong, Calculation of fission product yields for uranium isotopes by using a semi-empirical model, Eur. Phys. J. A 54, 173, 2018.
(2) P. Gastis, J.R. Winkelbauer, D.S. Connolly, S.A. Kuvin, S.M. Mosby, C.J. Prokop, I. Stetcu, „Absolute mass calibration of fission product distributions measured with the E-υ method”, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, Volume 1037, 2022A.J. Koning, D. Rochman, Modern Nuclear Data Evaluation with the TALYS Code System, Nuclear Data Sheets 113, 12, 2841-2934, 2012.
(3) H. Shen, et. al, “AMS measurements of fission products at CIAE”, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. in Phys. Res. Sec. B, 294,136-142, 2013.
(4) H. Moriyama, T. Ohnishi, Technical Reports of the Institute of Atomic Energy, 166, 1-22, 1974.
(5) Lee, J., Lee, YO., Park, TS. et al. M. J., Mass Distribution of the Fission Products of Plutonium Isotopes as Calculated by Using a Semi-empirical Model, Korean Phys. Soc. 77, 1082,2020.
(6) A. C. Wahl, Notes on Development of Models for Systematic Trends in Fission-Product Yields from High and Low Energy Fission Reactions, presented at the 1999 CRP Mtg, IAEA (1999).
(7) J.-F. Lemaître, S. Goriely, S. Hilaire, and J.-L. Sida, Fully microscopic scission-point model to predict fission fragment observables, Phys. Rev. C, 99, 034612, 2019.
(8) L. S. Danu, et.al, Fission yield calculations for 238U( 18O,f), Proceedings of the DAE Symp. On Nucl. Phys, 63, (2018).
(9) Y.K. Gupta, et. al, Fission fragment yield distribution in the heavy-mass region from the 239Pu(nth,f) reaction, Phys. rev. C., 96, 014608, 2017.
(10) M. Bolsterli et. al, New calculation of fission barriers for heavy and superheavy nuclei , Phys. Rev. C., 5, 1050, 1972.
(11) O. Litaizea, et. al, Fission modelling with FIFRELIN, Eur. Phys. J. A. 51, 117, 2015.
(12) P. Moller, J. R. Nix, Calculated ground-state properties of heavy nuclei, Nucl. Phys. A. 229,292, 1974.
(13) S. Bjornholm, J. E. Lynn, The double-humped fission barrier, Rev. of. Mod. Phys. 52, 725, (1980).
(14) Manjunatha, H.C. , Parameterization of fission barrier heights of medium, heavy and super heavy nuclei, Indian J Phys 92, 507, 2018.
(15) V. E. Viola, K. Kwiatkowski, and M. Walker,Systematics of fission fragment total kinetic energy release,Phys. Rev. C 31, 1550, 1985
(16) M. D. Usang, F. A. Ivanyuk, C. Ishizuka, and S. Chiba, Analysis of the total kinetic energy of fission fragments with the Langevin equation, Phys. Rev. C 96, 064617 – Published 22 December 2017.
(17) V. Yu. Denisov and I. Yu. Sedykh,Dependence of average total kinetic energy of fission fragments on the excitation energy of the compound nucleus, Phys. Rev. C 105, 014616, 2022
(18) J. Zhao, T Nisk, D. Vretener, Time-dependent generator coordinate method study of fission. II. Total kinetic energy distribution, Physical Review C, 106, 05409, 2022.
(19) L. Liu, X. Z. Wu, Y. J. Chen, C. W. Shen, Z. G. Ge, Z. X. Li, Impact of nuclear dissipation on the fission dynamics within the Langevin approach, Phys. Rev. C 105, 034614, 2022
(20) S L. Whetstone, Prompt-Neutron Emission from Single Fission Fragments, J R, Phys. Rev. 114,2, 1959.
(21) U Brosa and S Grossmann, Random neck rupture in deep-inelastic collisions, J. Phys. G : Nucl. Phys 10, 1984.
(22) D. Ramos, et al., Insight into excitation energy and structure effects in fission from isotopic information in fission yields, Phys. Rev. C 99, 024615, 2019.
(23) A. R. Balabekyan, et al., Symmetric and asymmetric fission modes in proton-induced fission at 660 MeV of 238U, Physics of Atomic Nuclei 73, 1814 (2010)
(24) Sawant, Y., Suryanarayana, S.V., Nayak, B.K. et al. Understanding fission fragment mass distributions in a shape-modified random neck rupture model. Pramana - J Phys 96, 188 2022.
(25) J.E. Lynn, I. Tews,S. Gandolfi, and A. Lovato,Quantum Monte Carlo Methods in Nuclear Physics: Recent Advances,Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science Vol. 69:279-305 2019.