Three-dimensional (X-Y-Z) Core Design of Long-Life Pressurized Water Reactor Using (Th-U)O2 Fuels with The Addition of Gd2O3 and Pa-231 as Burnable Poisons
Main Article Content
Abstract
Pressurized water reactors (PWRs) are one of the most dominant types of nuclear power plants that have been operated commercially to produce electricity in the world. The purpose of this study was to perceive a three-dimensional (X-Y-Z) core design of long-life PWR using Thorium-Uranium dioxide ((Th-U)O2) fuels with the addition of Gadolinium (Gd2O3) and Protactinium-231 (Pa-231) as the burnable poisons. A combination of Thorium and enriched Uranium fuels have a higher conversion ratio than other fuels, therefore can guarantee the reactor to operate longer. The burnable poison isotopes could be used to reduce excess reactivity due to the very high thermal neutron absorption cross-section. For core geometry analysis, a three-dimensional (X-Y-Z) geometry and a fuel volume fraction of 40% were applied. The computer code of SRAC 2006 from the Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA) and the JENDL 4.0 as a nuclear data library were used for calculation. In this study, different fractions of Uranium dioxide, Uranium-235, Gadolinium, and Protactinium-231 in fuel were carried out. The result of this study was a three-dimensional core design of 800 MWt PWR using 60% Uranium dioxide fuel with enriched Uranium-235 of 12%-11% and the addition of 0,025% Gd2O3 and 1,0% Pa-231 which could operate for ten years without refueling. This research is expected to be a reference for long-life PWR design using the Thorium and Uranium fuel cycles.
Downloads
Article Details
References
[2] Yudiarto et al., Indonesia Energy Outlook 2018. Center of Assessment for Process and Energy Industry, Jakarta, 2018.
[3] A. Waris and H. Sekimoto, Basic Study on Characteristics of Some Important Equilibrium Fuel Cycles of PWR, Annals of Nuclear Energy, 28(2), 153–167, 2001.
[4] M. N. Subkhi, Z. Su’ud, A. Waris, and S. Permana, Optimization of Small Long-Life PWR based on Thorium Fuel, Proc. The 5th Int. Conf. on Mathematics and Natural Sciences (November 2-3, 2014, Bandung, Indonesia), 1-4, 2014.
[5] R. Liberge and M. Arslan, Nuclear Fuel Cycle: Which Strategy to Sustain Nuclear Renaissance?, Proc. The 18th Int. Conf. on Nuclear Engineering (May 17-21, 2010, Xi'an, China), 2010.
[6] S. Permana, N. Takaki, and H. Sekimoto, Breeding Capability of Uranium and Thorium Fuel Cycles for Water Cooled Reactors, Proc. Int. Conf. on Advances in Nuclear Science and Engineering (November 13-14, 2007, Bandung, Indonesia), 233-238, 2007.
[7] T. Takei and A. Yamaji, Core Design of PWR-type Seed-blanket Core Breeder Reactor with Tightly Packed Fuel Assembly, Nuclear Engineering and Design, 333, 45-54, 2018.
[8] C. Juan, Z. Tao, and R. Ke, The Energy-Saving Diagnosis of PWR Nuclear Power Station based on The Thermo-Economic Analysis Model, Proc. The 18th Int. Conf. on Nuclear Engineering (May 17-21, 2010, Xi'an, China), 2010.
[9] S. Permana, Thorium Fuel Utilization Analysis on Small Long-Life Reactor for Different Coolant Types, Proc. Int. Conf. on Energy Sciences (July 25-27, 2016, Bandung, Indonesia), 2016.
[10] M. N. Subkhi, Z. Su’ud, A. Waris, and S. Permana, Design Concept of Small Long-Life PWR Using Square and Hexagonal Thorium Fuel, ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 11(2), 830-832, 2016.
[11] Rouf and Z. Su’ud, Conceptual Core Analysis of Long Life PWR Utilizing Thorium-Uranium Fuel Cycle, Proc. The 6th Asian Physics Symposium (August 19-20, 2015, Bandung, Indonesia), 2016.
[12] Rouf and Z. Su’ud, Analysis of Burnable Poison Effect on Combined (Th-U)O2 Fuel Cycle Performance in 800 MWt Long-life PWR, Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 9(28), 1-8, 2016.
[13] T. Setiadipura, M. N. Subkhi, Y. Astuti, and Z. Su’ud, Neutronic Design Study of Small Long-live PWR with (Th-U)O2 Fuel, Proc. of GLOBAL 2005 (October 9-13, 2005,Tsukuba, Japan), 510, 2005.
[14] S. Permana, N. Takaki, and H. Sekimoto, Feasible Region of Design Parameters for Water Cooled Thorium Breeder Reactor, Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, 44(7), 946-957, 2007.
[15] T.K. Kim and T.J. Downar, Thorium Fuel Performance in a Tight Pitch Light Water Reactor Lattice, Nuclear Technology, 138(1), 17-29, 2007.
[16] M. Lung and O. Gremm, Perspectives of the Thorium Fuel Cycle, Nuclear Engineering and Design, 180(2), 133-146, 1998.
[17] T. Ünak, What is the Potential Use of Thorium in the Future Energy Production Technology?, Progress in Nuclear Energy, 37(1-4), 137-144, 2000.
[19] S. Permana, N. Takaki, and H. Sekimoto, Breeding Capability and Void Reactivity Analysis of Heavy-Water-Cooled Thorium Reactor, Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, 45(7), 589-600, 2008.
[20] S. Permana, N. Takaki, and H. Sekimoto, Breeding and Void Reactivity Analysis on Heavy Metal Closed-cycle Water Cooled Thorium reactor, Annals of Nuclear Energy, 38(2-3), 337–34, 2011.
[21] V. Barchevtsev, H. Ninokata, and V. Artisyuk, Potential to Approach the Long-life Core in a Light Water Reactor with Uranium Oxide Fuel, Annals of Nuclear Energy, 29, 595–608, 2002.
[22] K. Okumura, T. Kugo, K. Kaneko, and K. Tsuchihashi, SRAC2006: A Comprehensive Neutronics Calculation Code System. Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute (JAERI), 2007.